You already know that Shoeless Joe Jackson was banned for life for his
involvement in the Series fix. Jackson is also barred from the Hall Of Fame,
though he has legions of supporters who would like to see him inducted. But Jackson
was not the only member of the Black Sox whose involvement in the scandal
has kept him out of the Hall; Eddie Cicotte was a great pitcher, a no-questions-asked
Hall Of Famer had he not been a crook.
Why so much support for Jackson, and not Cicotte?
Jackson doesn't win any honesty awards; it was Cicotte, after all, who first
confessed. True, Jackson played well in the Series, but Cicotte pitched very
well in his last two starts, and even won Game Seven (it was a Best-Of-Nine series).
Don't get me wrong; I don't think either of them should be in the Hall. But I
don't really understand the swell of support for Jackson, and not Cicotte, other
than Jackson looked like a good guy in
Field Of Dreams.
While I hate to give any award to a member
of the Black Sox, I do think Cicotte deserves the Cy Young this year. He led
the league in wins, complete games, and innings pitched; his 29-7 mark
was the best in the league by a good margin. Walter Johnson led the league
in ERA and shutouts, but Cicotte's ERA was only a little bit higher. I have
to take Cicotte, followed by Johnson. Then I'll take Allen Sothoron, a journeyman
who had a couple of fine years for St. Louis, and Stan Coveleski, who was
his usual outstanding self.
The choice of Coveleski is not a clear one; I
could take Carl Mays, who got stuck with a lousy won-loss record despite
pitching brilliantly. Mays was in the middle of an outstanding career, but
the Red Sox traded him to New York midway through the season, as if it wasn't
enough to send Babe Ruth packing a few months later. I could also select
Jim Shaw, who was affectionately nicknamed "Grunting Jim", or Lefty Williams,
one of the Black Sox. Williams was one of the few conspirators who seemed
to take the whole thing seriously; if it wasn't for his 0-3 record and 6.61
ERA, Chicago might have won the darn thing.
But I'll stick with Coveleski. He was a big
winner, he was versatile, and he pitched very well for the Indians.