Ned Garver almost won an MVP Award this season. Garver won 20 games for
the St. Louis Browns, a team that won only 52 games in total. That means
Garver won 40% of his team's games, which impressed a lot of voters. On
the other hand, his ERA wasn't great, and he walked more batters than he
struck out. Garver had a good year...but there were better ones.
After Garver, the top vote getters were Reynolds, Bob Feller,
Ellis Kinder, Raschi, and Lopat. I don't know what it was the
voters didn't like about Lopat. He was second in the AL in wins,
next to Feller, and had a much better ERA than Feller. Lopat was
also second in ERA, next to Saul Rogovin, and he had many more wins
than Rogovin. Lopat was second in shutouts, third in complete
games. He allowed the fewest baserunners per nine innings. I think
he is a pretty clear choice.
Lopat pitched for
12 years, and was consistently among the better pitchers in the league.
He began his career in Chicago, but had his glory years for the Yankees.
Lopat was a crafty left-hander who could be described as the Jimmy Key
of the 50's; he retired with 166 career wins, and numerous World Series
rings.
The Cleveland Indians also had a fine year, and had the best
pitching staff in the league. They were led by Early Wynn, Feller,
Mike Garcia, and Bob Lemon. Wynn pitched a lot of innings, won a
lot of games, and was third in the AL in ERA. He is a clear choice
for runner-up. Feller and Garcia had similar numbers; Feller
won a couple more games, but I think that Garcia pitched a little
better.